Thanks to a judge’s ruling in the case, Barry Bonds is likely to avoid playing baseball in some prison yard. Bad for the inmates who could have picked up some pointers on hitting the long ball. Good for Bonds. But the U.S. Attorney’s office still would like to see Bonds behind bars and is fighting to make that happen. Here’s the latest.
By Lance Williams
San Francisco Chronicle
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge abused her discretion when she made alleged positive steroid tests and other key evidence off-limits in Barry Bonds’ perjury trial, prosecutors said Monday.
Bonds’ prosecutors asked the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate the evidence, which Judge Susan Illston banned from the case Feb. 19, on the grounds that there was no proof the tests had anything to do with the former Giants star.
Bonds, 44, holder of baseball’s career home run record, had been scheduled to go to trial in March, accused of lying under oath about his use of steroids to the grand jury that investigated the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative steroids scandal. The judge’s ruling gutted the government’s case, and prosecutors took the unusual step of delaying the trial indefinitely while pursing an appeal.
OTHER STORIES OF INTEREST
- Bernie Madoff Hires Baltimore Firm to Try and Help Reduce Sentence (New York Post)
- U.S. Atty Office Still Trying to Keep Cooperation Agreements Secret (Southern District of Florida Blog)
- Ex-Saudi Spy Chief: Kill Bin Laden, Then Leave Afghanistan (Spy Talk)
- Former Enron Exec Could Get Home Confinement After Plea (Wall Street Journal)
- Man Jailed for Stealing Dinosaur Bone (AP)
- Ex-Illinois Police Chief Convicted of Extortion (Chicago Tribune)
- Federal Trial Begins for Indianapolis Narcotics Detectives Accused of Stealing Drugs and Money (Indianapolis Star)
One thought on “Fed Prosecutors in Barry Bonds Perjury Case Say Judge Abused Her Discretion”